Skip to content
California Local Ordinance Local Municipalities

Marin's County, CA's Housing Conundrum: Economic Reality Undermines State-Mandated Housing Development Goals

Susan Ameel |

Marin County, a jewel of Northern California, is grappling with a severe housing crunch, marked by California's third-highest median home prices. This economic reality forms the backdrop for a recent Grand Jury report and the City of Novato's strategic, multi-pronged response, intertwining aggressive housing production goals with robust tenant safeguards.

The Grand Jury Report: Unrealistic Goals and Economic Realities

Issued June 24, 2025, the Marin County Civil Grand Jury report, "The Worrisome Future of Marin Housing: NIMBY Resistance Takes a Backseat to Economic Reality," paints a stark picture. It concludes that Marin's 12 housing jurisdictions, including Novato, are unlikely to meet the state-mandated 6th Cycle housing goal of 14,405 new units by January 31, 2031. This represents an astronomical 627% increase over the previous cycle's target.

The Grand Jury identifies economic reality, not merely "NIMBY" resistance, as the primary impediment. Key findings include:

  • Lack of Financial Incentive: High interest rates, escalating construction and labor costs, complex state and local building regulations, and a scarcity of available land render new housing development financially unattractive for both market-rate and affordable housing developers. Marin's apartment cap rates, a measure of investment return, stood at a median of 5.15% in 2024, significantly lower than the U.S. average of 7%.
  • Workforce Exodus: The unaffordability of housing in Marin is forcing most public-sector workers—including teachers, police, and firefighters—to live outside the county, impacting retention and satisfaction.
  • Compliance Risks: Failure to achieve these mandated goals exposes jurisdictions to litigation, financial penalties, loss of permitting authority, and even court receivership, severely impacting local control over development.
  • Slow Progress: In the first year of the 6th cycle (2023), Marin jurisdictions collectively permitted only 462 units, a mere 25% of the annual 1,800-unit requirement.

While state laws since 2017 (over 100 bills) aim to streamline housing development and reduce local obstruction, the Grand Jury found these new laws introduce complexity, and local jurisdictions struggle to align their processes.

Novato's Measured Response: Planning for Success Amidst Challenges

On August 26, 2025, the Novato City Council formally responded to the Grand Jury's findings and recommendations. The City's stance reflects a determination to meet its obligations while acknowledging the immense hurdles:

  • Housing Goals (F1): Novato partially disagrees that it will fail to meet its allocation of 2,090 units for the 6th Cycle. The City asserts it has a state-certified Housing Element and adequate site area. As of December 31, 2024, 805 residential units (38.5% of its total) have been entitled, with an additional 268 units under review. Novato acknowledges it "has no control over private development construction and financing" but is "planning for success".
  • Economic Returns (F2), State Penalties (F3), Workforce Affordability (F4): Novato agrees with these critical findings, underscoring the shared understanding of the financial disincentives for development, the risks of non-compliance, and the impact on its public-sector workforce.
  • Public Information (F5), Fee Transparency (F6), Developer Engagement (F7), ADU Path (F8): Novato wholly disagrees with these findings, asserting that it actively informs the public on state law constraints, maintains cost-neutral fee structures with detailed monthly statements, proactively engages with developers through various channels and forums, and provides a ministerial path for Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) construction.
  • Multifamily Housing Path (F9): Novato partially disagrees, noting it offers ministerial review for multifamily developments in some zoning districts (R10, R20) and waives use permit requirements for qualifying projects per state law. The City plans to amend its zoning code by FY 2025/2026 to eliminate use permit requirements for residential portions of mixed-use developments, effectively ensuring a ministerial path.

Regarding the Grand Jury's recommendations, Novato has already implemented R3 (proactive developer engagement) and R5 (ministerial ADU path). R6 (ministerial multifamily path) will be implemented by June 30, 2026. However, Novato will not implement R1, R2, and R4, arguing that quarterly updates, public engagement on state law, and project-level fee accounting are redundant, resource-intensive, or potentially misleading.

The Novato Advantage: Bolstering Tenant Protections

Simultaneously with its Grand Jury response, Novato is moving to enhance tenant protections, a critical component of its state-certified 6th Cycle Housing Element. Following a May 20, 2025, City Council directive, staff are preparing a local Just Cause Tenant Protections Ordinance. This initiative aligns with Goal 5 of its Housing Element – Housing Conservation and Tenant Protections and Program 5.I, which seeks to expand upon statewide "just cause" eviction protections.

California's Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (AB 1482) already provides a baseline, capping annual rent increases and requiring "just cause" for evictions after one year of occupancy. The law details "at-fault" causes (e.g., non-payment of rent, lease breaches) and "no-fault" causes (e.g., owner occupancy, withdrawing from rental market). Crucially, AB 1482 allows cities to enact local ordinances offering greater protections.

Novato's proposed expansions aim to:

  • Extend protections for no-fault evictions resulting from "red-tag" events, repairs, rehabilitation, or demolitions.
  • Include robust provisions for relocation assistance and a right of return for displaced tenants.
  • The city has the authority to mandate relocation assistance beyond state minimums (currently two months' fair market rent plus utility deposits for health and safety vacate orders).

This focus on tenant stability is particularly relevant given that 31.9% of Novato's housing units are rented, with most multifamily units occupied by renters. This demographic highlights the potential for housing insecurity that such an ordinance would address. The city has conducted extensive public outreach through workshops in August 2025, engaging landlords, tenants, advocates, and community groups, including a Spanish-language session for maximum inclusivity. These public discussions will inform the August 26, 2025 City Council study session for final policy direction.

Outlook: Novato's complex approach – simultaneously pushing to meet ambitious housing production goals, pushing back on some Grand Jury critiques, and moving to expand tenant protections – signals a sophisticated, yet challenging, navigation of California's housing crisis. The interplay of state mandates, economic realities, and local policy innovations will be key to shaping its future housing landscape.

Share this post